NCache vs Pivotal GemFire - A Detailed Feature Comparison
This document compares NCache with Pivotal GemFire and contrasts their significant differences. This comparison focuses on all the major areas that a good in-memory distributed cache should provide. For a detailed comparison, please read the PDF.
- Partial = Partial Support
- Yes = Full Support
- No = No Support
- Verify = Please Verify Yourself
- Coming = Coming Soon
Feature
Pivotal GemFire
NCache
.NET Platform Support
- .NET Cache Client
Yes
Yes
- .NET Core Cache Client
No
Yes
- .NET NuGet Packages
No
Yes
- .NET Cache Server
No
Yes
- .NET Core Cache Server
No
Coming
- .NET Server-Side Code
No
Yes
- .NET Core Server-Side Code
No
Coming
- ASP.NET Core Session Persistence (basic)
No
Yes
- ASP.NET Core Session Persistence (advanced)
No
Yes
- ASP.NET Core Sessions (Multiple-site)
No
Yes
- ASP.NET Session State Caching (basic)
No
Yes
- ASP.NET Session State Caching (advanced)
No
Yes
- ASP.NET Sessions State (Multiple-site)
No
Yes
- ASP.NET View State Cache
No
Yes
- ASP.NET Output Cache
No
Yes
- Cache Admin (GUI Tool)
Yes
Yes
- Monitoring Tool (GUI Tool)
Yes
Yes
- Windows PerfMon Counters
No
Yes
- Admin Tools (Windows PowerShell)
No
Yes
- Admin Tools (Command Line)
Yes
Yes
- Administration and Monitoring API
Yes
Yes