When to use client cache with distributed caching

A distributed cache is essential for any application that demands fast performance during extreme transaction loads. An in-memory distributed cache is faster than a database. And, it can provide linear scalability in handling greater transaction loads because it can easily let you add more servers to the cache cluster that a database server cannot do.

Despite all these benefits, there is still one problem. In most cases a distributed cache is hosted on a set of dedicated cache servers across the network so your application has to make network trips to fetch any data. And, this is not as fast as accessing data locally and especially from within the application process. This is where client cache comes in handy.

Download NCache free trial - Extremely fast and scalable in-memory distributed cache

In NCache, a client cache keeps a connection open to the distributed cache cluster and receives event notifications from the cache cluster whenever client cache data changes there. A distributed cache cluster knows which data items are being kept in which client cache so event notifications are sent only the relevant client cache instead of broadcasting them to all client caches.

How does client cache work?

A client cache is nothing but a local cache on your web/application server but one that is aware of a distributed cache and is connected to it. Additionally, a client cache can either be in-process, meaning a client cache exists inside your application process, or out-of-process. This allows a client cache to deliver much faster read performance than even distributed cache and at the same time ensure that client cache data is always kept synchronized with the distributed cache.

ncache-client-cache

ncache-client-cache

However, a distributed cache notifies client cache asynchronously after it successfully updates data in the distributed cache cluster. This means that there is technically a small window of time (in milliseconds) during which some of the data in client cache is older than the distributed cache. Now, in most cases, this is perfectly acceptable to applications. But, in some cases, applications demand 100% accuracy of data.

So, to handle such situations, NCache provides a pessimistic synchronization model for client cache as well. In this model, every time the application tries to fetch anything from the client cache, the client cache first checks whether the distributed cache has a newer version of the same cached item. If it does, then the client cache fetches newer version from the distributed cache. Now, this trip to the distributed cache has its cost but it is still faster than fetching the cached item entirely from the distributed cache.

When to use a client cache?

So, having known all of this, the main question that comes to mind is when to use a client cache and when not to use it. Well, the answer is pretty straight forward. Use a client cache if you’re doing a lot more reads than writes and especially if you’re reading the same items over and over again. And, if you’re doing a lot of updates or at least as many updates as reads (e.g. in case of ASP.NET Session State or JSP Servlet Session storage in NCache) then don’t use a client cache because the updates are actually slower with a client cache because you’re updating two different caches now, the client cache and the distributed cache.

So, NCache allows you to take advantage of client cache with a distributed cache. Download a fully working 60-day trial of NCache Enterprise and try it out for yourself.

Download NCache Trial | NCache Details

This entry was posted in ASP.Net, client cache, Distributed caching and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to When to use client cache with distributed caching

  1. Marina says:

    You have really interesting blog, keep up posting such informative posts!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


× 5 = twenty

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>